Do you think it’s catchy? I came up with it myself.
Yes, I know: “Cristina, please keep your day job, because you’re never going to be an advertising mogul.”
But my mind wanders already. And before you come to any hasty conclusions... it’s merely due to an excess of Pinot Noir, my reward for surviving another deadline.
Oh, I’m sorry. Did you say it was Mother’s Day today? And I spent the day working?
But I digress.
As many of you are aware, a group of Salmon Creek residents has begun meeting to brainstorm about how best to deal with the diesel-dope crisis, which is a scourge on the environment, a high fire risk, and an economic disaster. I attended a meeting in Salmon Creek (well, not in the creek) last week, and I was impressed with their efforts. The people involved are working really hard to come up with ideas for tackling the problem on a multitude of fronts – from educating their neighbors, to waging a public-relations campaign against diesel dope, to collecting hard data about its effects.
I have a lot of thoughts about this issue, both on an individual level (22-year-old boys driving $50,000 trucks, without a care for the land or the community that sustains them) and on an industrial level (the devastation wreaked in our state and national parks, other public lands, and timber lands). I will post these at a later date, along with all the other thoughts I’ve promised to post at a later date (about Hillary, polygamy, my mother – remember those?).
In the meantime, here are a few numbers, courtesy of one of those Salmon Creek residents.
*****
The numbers are out!
So, how much energy does it take to make one pound of indoor pot grown with diesel? First off, here are some numbers – and then I’ll show you what they mean.
-One gallon of diesel burned produces 22.4 lbs. of CO2.
-One gallon of gasoline burned produces 19.4 lbs. of CO2 at 20 mpg (average SUV/truck), which equals .97 lbs. of CO2 per mile (let’s just call it a pound per mile).
-It is estimated that it takes one gallon of diesel per day, per light.
-On a 75-day cycle, that equals 75 gallons per light, at an average of one pound per light.
-75 gallons per light x 22.4 lbs. of CO2 = 1,680 lbs. of CO2 released per pound of pot produced.
And now you ask, “What does that mean?!”
That means that producing one pound of pot indoors is roughly equivalent to:
-Jumping in that SUV at 20 mpg and driving from Eureka, California, to El Paso, Texas!
-Driving that same SUV from SFO (that’s San Francisco to you acronym-debilitated) to Vegas three times! Or...
-SFO to L.A. four times! Or...
-You can say growing 1 & 3/4 lbs. of pot indoors is equivalent to driving from SFO to NYC!
Feeling nauseous yet?
These estimates are based on a 75-day cycle, and may need to be adjusted as we obtain more information. The numbers may increase or decrease slightly, so it’s a little too early to settle into these findings. Still, it’s a real testament to the severity of the situation, taking into consideration that these numbers still don’t take into account the energy used to mine and transport soil and fertilizers, and the energy used to haul in the fuel.
In general, you don’t see these folks racing to turn on their generators driving hybrids, either. Most are driving big gas guzzlers to check on and maintain their scene.
*****
The person who crunched the above numbers is also working on plane-travel equivalents, as well as Kilowatt hours used to produce one pound of indoor marijuana.
And yes, this will be a news story sometime in the next few months.
Monday, May 12, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
17 comments:
So what happens if the diesel dopers get a conscience and quit?
Are the majority of the plants being grown for medicinal purposes? How many people are going to perish in misery from lack of medicine if they stop growing it?
The diesel dopers don’t shop around here very much, but what little shopping that they do helps the local stores, which in turn places ads in the local papers which in turn pays for your job. Which, by the way, you do exceedingly well. We would miss you!
All the people employed in the fuel industry will have to look for new jobs. The tire shops will have to go back to selling re-caps to make ends meet. What about all of the young girls that will have to make it in a harsh world without plastic enhancements?
I’ve been told that alcohol (Pinot Noir) makes people mean. But do you really want to condemn the poor south-county girls to flat-chested obscurity? Where’s your heart?
It's not the marijuana. It's the diesel, dope.
Folks, this is Humboldt. Medicine falls from the sky. It's passed around freely at concerts. No one, but no one, is going to perish for lack of weed.
What if those poor folks who need "the medicine" they are allegedly growing need it for the lung cancer they got from inhaling all the carbon emissions from those filthy generators? Or pancreatic or liver cancers from drinking water contaminated by diesel? Or for toxics-related illnesses from smoking all the pesticide and fungicide laced dope from those moldy indoor factories? Or maybe they suffered smoke inhalation from a fire started by crappy wiring or an overheated generator?
Here's another factor to consider. We are at war over oil. So they grow with a method that requires how many gallons of oil to produce a single pound?
No blood for bud!
Another thing to consider--that code enforcement BS--those warrants Desidier wrote were all about looking for indoor cultivation. Diesel doping brings cops to the neighborhoods. I'm not defending the cops, they were total a**holes, and they got slapped down for using code as a pretext for dope investigations. But as long as there is big diesel, you can be certain the Humboldt's finest will continue to come up with more stupid and meaner ways to criminally profile and harass our otherwise peaceful watersheds. So code enforcement didn't work--what's next? The Feds?
Thanks, Cristina, for bringing attention to this.
8:52 if Pinot makes people mean, than why do they call marijuana dope?
Although filled with valid points, that whole post was was tongue-in-cheek. Cristina could never be mean.
"Cristina could never be mean."
That was very, very sweet, and obviously written by someone who has never been unfortunate enough to encounter me in the early morning. Which is any time before 2 p.m.
Anon 10:44 makes a number of excellent points, and they are all points that the group in Salmon Creek is researching and considering. Personally, I think one of the best ways to combat diesel dope might be to start a Green Revolution for marijuana, much like the one we've seen in food in the last decade or two.
I was shocked, a year or two after I moved here and started learning about such things, to learn that indoor marijuana fetches a higher price than the outdoor, organically-grown variety. And it's for the same reasons that fast-food restaurants buy genetically-modified potatoes from Big Ag: consistency! It has nothing to do with quality or taste.
This strikes me, in this day and age, as phenomenally backwards thinking - especially considering how many marijuana users think of themselves as being forward-thinking and eco-groovy in other ways. But they don't know what they're sucking into their lungs? And what its production is doing to the Earth? SHEESH!
Uh-oh. I'm pontificating.
Cristna said: "This strikes me, in this day and age, as phenomenally backwards thinking - especially considering how many marijuana users think of themselves as being forward-thinking and eco-groovy in other ways. But they don't know what they're sucking into their lungs? And what its production is doing to the Earth? SHEESH!"
Enough said.
Legalize it. Commercialize it, Tax it. Be done with it.
Cristina,
Thanks for putting this out. I just ran some figures for an interview I did with Tom Allman (your Sheriff) and came up with, for the larger grows that make less than pound per light, figures of 117+gallons of diesel per pound.
I wish someone who is doing diesel grows would anonymously tell us how much diesel they expend to get a pound. I'm not sure many have figured it out but I sure would be interested in knowing.
What are the demographics? Who buys the dope? You’ll probably find that it’s people that don’t give any more of a hoot about anything than the people that grow it. It’s the “high” that they are looking for, and they go for bang-for-the-buck. I’m guessing it’s young wealthy and college age kids. Most of them are extremely liberal, and go to great lengths to tell you what you have done wrong with the world.
I’ve always thought that people that accused others of great wrongdoing were holding other people’s indiscretions up as a red herring for you to look at, so that you don’t look at their own faults. We had a lot of those types that moved up here in the late sixties and early seventies. They immediately started pointing out what the local ranchers and loggers were doing wrong. Well, if you’ve noticed, all of the ranchers and loggers are gone. They are now turning on each other. Some are saying screw-you, I’ll grow my dope anyway I please. While others are saying they can’t. It’s kinda’ nice to see them picking on each other for a change.
Most people that use pot around here grow their own, for the same reason that we all live here, to control the quality of our “life spaces”. (I just made “life Spaces” up, I’m feeling creative like Cristina).
How about a bumper sticker campaign?
It would say:
"Ask me how my indoor grow is damaging the environment."
What do you think?
Eko: Agreed. It was legal up until 1937 or 1938, if I recall correctly.
Kym: I'm putting together some notes - thoughts that I had following the Salmon Creek meeting - that I'll send you when I've got my head screwed on a bit more tightly.
Tom Allman is very, very concerned about the diesel-dope situation in Mendocino County. BTW - in case you didn't know - he was actually born and raised in SoHum. He graduated from South Fork in the late 70's.
Wake Up, you made several valid points. The only one that I would add is that as far as I've been able to discern, indoor growing was not being done in the late 60's and early 70's. However, it IS very distressing that a lot of the values shared by that generation aren't necessarily shared by this one.
As for red herrings and pointing fingers: unfortunately true. It's very difficult for me to cope with the holier-than-thou attitude that's prevalent in certain circles.
On a similar note, I think we as a greater community need to figure out a way to have a conversation about the industrial scenes on timber lands and public lands - the ones that are being tended by Mexicans, although we (John Q. & Jane R. Public) don't know who's running them - without someone having a hysterical fit and screaming "Racism!"
It IS happening, it MUST be dealt with, and we have to approach the conversation intelligently: not thinking in terms of "all brown people are criminals" or "all brown people are unfairly discriminated against," but rather, "just like with white people, most brown people are hard-working, good people, and a few of them are criminals."
I am not going to defend the Humboldt County Sheriff's Deputy who shot a man to death at an industrial grow scene on PL land last year, but I must confess: I was beyond horrified when I saw comments on blogs like, "He was a farmer defending his crop!"
"Farmer defending his crop" my ass! Worker defending a 70,000-plant garden that was spilling heaven knows how much diesel and rodenticide into the earth, and siphoning water from creeks that are already empty of salmon!
So, do you think this is a discussion we can have as adults?
I'd like to see the community have a conversation where it isn't about demonizing one side or the other. Let's discuss individual problems without claiming indoor growers or marijuana growers or old timers or loggers or...are bad guys.
It is possible to say, "I don't like a practice or behavior" without lumping everything ever done by that person under "bad guy" or "criminal."
(I like your Footprints pic.)
Cristina,
I thought I'd let you know my Sheriff Allman piece is posted. As you'll see by my disclaimer at the bottom, I did know Tom graduated from South Fork.
I would love to see the conversation on Marijuana growing practices open up a little.
Unless you deal with the issue that its a financial incentive that causes epole to grow indoors. It was alluded to by "consistency".
Because its illegal, it can't be regulated and the price is much greater than it costs to produce. Thats the financial incentive and it attracts criminally minded people.
They won't accept being blackmailed by environmental issues into accepting restrictions on their methods, as long as they are the only ones subject to the legal risks.
Sorry to say but to deal with this locally, Southern Humboldt "needs" a mafia that regulates and coerces the various illegal actors. A "mafia" essentially is a government but without sanction of the sovereign.
Its clear that economic incentive has revealed the 70's New Pioneer ideal of "community solidarity" to be a narcissistic myth. Reggae on the River and Tooby Ranch debacles are other myth busters.
I listened to you and Eric Kirk on KMUD tonight and thought to myself, this is why my Native American friends tell me white people cannot be trusted to deal fairly with Native Americans when it comes to recovery of their former lands.
Cristina, I warned you that Eric was joining Hank Sims in ridiculing Bear River's Heartlands Project. This amounts to racist prejudice against local Native Americans attempting to recover their aboriginal territorial lands. I personally couple Eric's racist attitude shown here with his support of colonial Zionism which also is based on racism.
You can read why I make this obvious connection at my blog site at:
http://steve-lewis.blogspot.com/
I do wish you would stop and think twice about what you are doing as a community news information source. What is your religious background because if it isn't Christian then your comment worrying about "Christian Democrats" is worrisome in itself to those of us who do not want our news filtered through prejudiced minds.
That last caller who talked about McKinney and wouldn't go into her anti-Zionist stance because he knew that in our community pro-Zionists are at the helm of community news and information.
Way to go 6:45.
Le's see, first the angst over people growing more than 20 plants, way back then; second, angst about indoor growers and green houses, now diesel dope. Oh yeah, and the bogus 215 fiasco.
We have and are 'outside the law' if you grow pot. I am so tired of the holier than thou growers, my dope practices are good, yours are bad. My drug of choice is good, yours is bad.
I am old school, outdoor, one crop kinda girl. Highly doubtful, growing practices will revert back to just one crop any time soon. What would we do without the cash infusion every three months. If it's legalized, someone will figure out how to turn crops in three weeks to generate the income they have grown accustomed. Im sure its in the works. I want to see outdoor regain it's superior place in the quality/value thing. I want to see the pendulum swing, maybe it's happening. Please get off the pedestals, outlaws. Self-coping, that will go over well.
I'm not worried about "Christian Democrats," Stephen - and I don't remember making a comment about them.
My worries are about the far-right-wing "Christians," the Hagees and the Dobsons who have hijacked the Republican Party for their own nefarious purposes. These men do not follow in Christ's footsteps; they are propheteers who bilk the poor out of their hard-earned wages and brainwash them into believing people like Barack Obama are "the enemy." And then they take those donations, from those hard-earned wages, and use them for filthy purposes such as (in Pat Robertson's case) investing in diamond mining in Africa and cozying up to class-A fuckers like Robert Mugabe.
I could go on and on.
From what I've seen in the Arcata area, I can't help but feel like the increased indoor growing is related to the CAMP crack-downs through the years. Frankly, indoor growing has become less risky and more profitable for many.
I've met a few folk who moved out to the hills many many years ago to do their thing. And now they are moving back to town, to do their thing.
"It's the economy stupid..."
If we decriminalized MJ, then the it could be more of a free and competitive market. And while I'm not a fan of taxes, I would happily pay tax on MJ since it is more or less the same as buy the protection of the government. Which I understand you can do in Mendo - the Sheriff will sell you per plant licenses for $50 each. So if the Mendo sheriff rolls up to your place, they won't pull the plants with Sheriff tags on the trunk.
Post a Comment